Artwork

Content provided by Prologue Projects. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Prologue Projects or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Bowles v. Russell

55:35
 
Share
 

Manage episode 290926362 series 2622019
Content provided by Prologue Projects. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Prologue Projects or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
The hosts are joined by Josie Duffy Rice and Jay Willis of The Appeal, to discuss "Worst Supreme Court Justice of All Time" bracketology, and simple arithmetic. This week's case is Bowles v. Russell, in which the petitioner sought to have his appeal heard because a judge had miscalculated a deadline, and his lawyer had the audacity to adhere to it. The court denied the petitioner, citing "rules are rules, even when they aren't actually rules."

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

217 episodes

Artwork

Bowles v. Russell

5-4

785 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 290926362 series 2622019
Content provided by Prologue Projects. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Prologue Projects or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
The hosts are joined by Josie Duffy Rice and Jay Willis of The Appeal, to discuss "Worst Supreme Court Justice of All Time" bracketology, and simple arithmetic. This week's case is Bowles v. Russell, in which the petitioner sought to have his appeal heard because a judge had miscalculated a deadline, and his lawyer had the audacity to adhere to it. The court denied the petitioner, citing "rules are rules, even when they aren't actually rules."

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

217 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide