))
'In defence of Foakes v Beer': CULS Debate (audio)
Архивные серии ("Канал не активен" status)
When?
This feed was archived on July 29, 2021 19:10 (
Why? Канал не активен status. Нашим серверам не удалось получить доступ к каналу подкаста в течении длительного периода времени.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 270713952 series 2782797
Контент предоставлен Daniel Bates and Cambridge University. Весь контент подкастов, включая выпуски, графику и описания подкастов, загружается и предоставляется непосредственно Daniel Bates and Cambridge University или его партнером по платформе подкастов. Если вы считаете, что кто-то использует вашу работу, защищенную авторским правом, без вашего разрешения, вы можете выполнить процедуру, описанную здесь https://ru.player.fm/legal.
On 21 January 2020, CULS hosted a debate on the proposition "In defence of Foakes v Beer", which featured Dr Janet O'Sullivan and Mr William Day, chaired by Dr Jonathan Morgan. This is the central question posed by the seminal contract case of Foakes v Beer, and a question which generations of law tripos students have had to grapple with. This event was designed to enrich the contract law tripos module and was particularly aimed at allowing Part IB students to supplement their lecture notes and further reading. For more information see the CULS website at: https://culs.org.uk This entry provides an audio source for iTunes.
…
continue reading
43 эпизодов
Поделиться
