Discussing 'The Dambusters' (1955) with Dr. Dan Ellin

Review It Yourself

21:04

Step into the mysterious and visually stunning world of The Electric State as host Francesca Amiker takes you behind the scenes with the creative masterminds who brought Simon Stålenhag’s dystopian vision to life. In this premiere episode, directors Joe and Anthony Russo, stars Millie Bobby Brown and Chris Pratt, writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely, and producers Angela Russo-Otstot and Chris Castaldi reveal how they transformed a haunting graphic novel into an epic cinematic experience. Watch The Electric State coming to Netflix on March 14th. Check out more from Netflix Podcasts . State Secrets: Inside the Making of The Electric State is produced by Netflix and Treefort Media.…

год назад 1:24:20

MP3•Главная эпизода

Dr. Dan Ellin, Historian and Archivist from the International Bomber Command Centre, joins Sean to discuss The Dam Busters (1955).

Discussion Points:

-Dan discusses his love/hate relationship with the film and it's portrayal of Operation Chastise.

-The absence of major motion pictures about RAF Bomber Command.

-The importance of collective memory regarding the Second World War.

-The use of the Dam Busters march at 'Bomber' Harris's funeral.

-The enemies in the film: bureaucrats, Whitehall and red tape.

-The fantastic casting in the film.

-The incredible flying during the making of the film.

-Putting RAF Bomber Command into historical context.

-The lack of the raid on the Sorpe Dam in the film.

-The impact of the Official Secrets Act on the film.

-Sean does his best to translate very English aspects of the film for American listeners.

-The optics of history and the loss of nuance.

-The influence on this film on George Lucas when he was making Star Wars (1977).

-The things that Britain leans back on in times of adversity.

Raised Questions:

-Do people see RAF Bomber Command as either 'Dam Busters or Dresden'?

-Are the historical details faithfully intact?

-How important are myths to a country?

-Was it really difficult for Barnes Wallis to get the idea for the raid accepted?

-Why do the British love an underdog story?

-Did the Americans have better PR and spin?

-Would you love to see Peter Jackson's The Dam Busters?

-Does the film tell the story of what happened rather than what was meant to happen?

-Why is Guy Gibson portrayed a certain way in the film?

-Does the film lack nuance?

-Does the film serve as a good starting point for people who may not know the story of the Dam Busters raid?

Discussing 'The Dambusters' (1955) with Dr. Dan Ellin

Review It Yourself

published год назад

MP3•Главная эпизода

Dr. Dan Ellin, Historian and Archivist from the International Bomber Command Centre, joins Sean to discuss The Dam Busters (1955).

Discussion Points:

-Dan discusses his love/hate relationship with the film and it's portrayal of Operation Chastise.

-The absence of major motion pictures about RAF Bomber Command.

-The importance of collective memory regarding the Second World War.

-The use of the Dam Busters march at 'Bomber' Harris's funeral.

-The enemies in the film: bureaucrats, Whitehall and red tape.

-The fantastic casting in the film.

-The incredible flying during the making of the film.

-Putting RAF Bomber Command into historical context.

-The lack of the raid on the Sorpe Dam in the film.

-The impact of the Official Secrets Act on the film.

-Sean does his best to translate very English aspects of the film for American listeners.

-The optics of history and the loss of nuance.

-The influence on this film on George Lucas when he was making Star Wars (1977).

-The things that Britain leans back on in times of adversity.

Raised Questions:

-Do people see RAF Bomber Command as either 'Dam Busters or Dresden'?

-Are the historical details faithfully intact?

-How important are myths to a country?

-Was it really difficult for Barnes Wallis to get the idea for the raid accepted?

-Why do the British love an underdog story?

-Did the Americans have better PR and spin?

-Would you love to see Peter Jackson's The Dam Busters?

-Does the film tell the story of what happened rather than what was meant to happen?

-Why is Guy Gibson portrayed a certain way in the film?

-Does the film lack nuance?

-Does the film serve as a good starting point for people who may not know the story of the Dam Busters raid?

Все серии

1
Prometheus (2012) 2:22:36

3 дня назад2:22:36

2:22:36

Sarah is back! She and Sean finally discuss one of their oddly favourite films, Prometheus (2012). Discussion Points: -Sean likes this film, but can see it's faults. -Sarah really appreciates the story's set-up and the unusual landscape. -The film's aesthetics and themes versus the execution and uneven tone. -Sarah loves films where people grapple with their faith. -Sarah's recollections of watching the med-pod scene. -The incredibly awful line reads. -Sarah loved the well-rounded character of Doctor Elizabeth Shaw. -Sean and Sarah discuss Alien: Romulus (2024). Raised Questions: -Is this film trying to insult your intelligence? -Does every tie-in with the Alien franchise weaken the direction that Prometheus was trying to take? -Is the script "too hand-hold-y"? -Does the film feel over-edited to you? -Is the crew of 17 too big? -Why does humanity seek answers? -Is the script "too ham-hocked"? -Is David infatuated with Elizabeth Shaw? -Why doesn't Idris Elba's character do anything until the end? -What happens if Archaeologists find the Engineer's robe? Time Stamps: 0:06 Welcome to Review It Yourself 1:23 The Long-Awaited Prometheus Review 7:21 The Film's Opening and Visuals 12:38 Themes of Creation and Faith 16:18 Exploring the Characters and Their Dynamics 20:59 The Engineers and Their Significance 25:59 The Unfolding of the Plot 29:33 The Role of David and AI Commentary 32:41 Critique of Character Development 34:51 Action vs. Atmosphere in Storytelling 35:50 The Philosophical Questions Raised 37:03 The Flaws and Strengths of Prometheus 44:43 Love, Relationships, and Their Portrayal 49:01 Conclusion: A Mixed Bag of Ideas 1:14:10 Character Introductions 1:15:23 David's Understanding of Love 1:20:58 Quarantine Procedures 1:23:42 The Importance of Emotional Reactions 1:29:30 The Horrors of Creation 1:30:27 Themes of Control and Gender 1:37:48 The Nature of Faith 1:47:18 The Engineers' Intentions 1:52:39 The Final Confrontation 1:58:08 The Complexity of Faith 2:09:14 A Mixed Bag of Themes 2:18:17 The Implications of Scientific Discovery 2:20:14 The Value of Long-Form Discussions Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Konvoi /The Arctic Convoy (2023) with Jamie from 'Old Shipping Lines' 1:02:01

10 дней назад1:02:01

1:02:01

Sean is joined by Jamie from 'Old Shipping Lines' YouTube Channel to review the Norwegian film, Konvoi (2023), known internationally as The Arctic Convoy. The film appears to be based upon the true story of the 1942 PQ17 convoy, one of the first major Anglo-American convoys of the Second World War. Discussion Points: -Sean needs his nautical fix. -Why this film is one of Jamie's favourite films. -The poor promotional poster. -The fantastic script, sound design and special effects. -Sean was surprised to see RAF Coastal Command. -The importance of the Atlantic and the Artic (Russian) Convoys in the Second World War. -Jamie and Sean were impressed by the depth of characters. -The dynamic between the Captain and the First Mate. -The reasons why this film focuses upon the Norwegian Merchant Sailors, who lost 4,000 lives during the war. -Sean and Jamie empathise with different characters. Raised Questions: -Do you love film recommendations from friends? -Why is this film one of Jamie's favourite films? -Are Norwegian films the best out there right now? -Why do the British always get derided in modern war films? -Why don't you eat pickled herring at your desk? -What is the difference between the words 'disperse' and 'scatter'? -Is the Naval side of the Second World War difficult to translate films? The Norwegian War Sailor's Register (Krigsseilerregisteret): https://www.krigsseilerregisteret.no/en Recommendations: -PQ17: An Artic Convoy Disaster (2014), a BBC documentary, hosted by Jeremy Clarkson. Time Stamps: 0:24 Welcome and Introductions 2:04 Film Overview: The Arctic Convoy 3:07 Personal Connection to Norwegian Cinema 8:46 Historical Context of Convoys 13:36 Character Dynamics and Interactions 17:56 The Captain's Leadership Style 21:40 Tension Between the First Mate and Captain 25:02 The Battle Scenes and Tactics 28:45 Thematic Exploration of Fear and Duty 32:31 Emotional Moments and Character Development 35:55 The Role of the Radio Operator 38:19 Confrontations and Power Struggles 46:52 The Plan to Escape 49:03 The Icy Challenges Ahead 55:31 Recommendations for Similar Films 59:55 Closing Thoughts and Future Plans Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Modern Films: Flying or Dying? with Stew from 'Stew World Order' 1:09:25

17 дней назад1:09:25

1:09:25

Stew from 'Stew World Order' joins Sean to try and answer the question: Modern Films, are they flying or dying? Stew believes we're in a golden age, Sean does not... Time Stamps: 1:29 Film Debate: Flying or Dying? 1:40 Generational Nostalgia 6:02 Access to Diverse Films 10:48 Voices in Cinema 14:41 The Case Against Modern Films 17:12 Poor Writing and World Building 20:02 Death of Comedy 22:38 The Decline of Movie Stars 45:24 The Shift in Film Quality 1:04:08 Conclusion: Quality vs. Quantity 1:08:21 Podcast Wrap-Up Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? (1963) 1:45:12

24 дня назад1:45:12

1:45:12

Sean is feeling the pressure this week as he and Sarah review his Auntie's favourite film: What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? (1963). Discussion Points: -What the hell happened to acting and film-making. -The tour de force performances from Bette Davis and Joan Crawford. -Sarah and Sean were surprised by the sheer class of the entire production. -The career of Davis and Crawford. -The golden age of Hollywood. -The outstanding performances of the supporting cast. -Sarah loves a sad and cynical film. -The impeccable sound design. -Sean and Sarah can't wait to watch 'The Letter' (1940). -Whether Award-winning films have become more forgettable. -The death of Hollywood star power and 'learning your craft'. -Sean has nothing personally against Zendaya, he was just making a point about the lack of acting prowess in the "go-to actors and actresses" of today. -The promotional tours the actresses went on. Raised Questions: -Have you ever made up your own words? -Why don't we get films like this anymore? -Why do older films see to be so much better than what we get now? -Did the film make you question your own sanity? -How have the Jane sister's become so isolated from the world? -Are they in a cage of their own making? -Who is the one really orchestrating the situation? -Why doesn't Blanche just shout out of the window? -Why are leading ladies pushed so much in modern-day films and series, when we had amazing actresses like Joan Crawford and Bette Davis in the past? -How amazing was Bette Davis? -Have we collectively dropped our expectations for films? Time Stamps: 0:11 Introduction 3:43 Film Overview: What Ever Happened to Baby Jane 8:34 The Performances: A Masterclass in Acting 21:33 The Complex Relationship of Jane and Blanche 29:00 Cinematic Techniques: Lighting and Sound Design 35:42 The Twisted Backstory Unveiled 44:00 The Climax: Tension Builds 50:21 The Film's Conclusion: Layers of Manipulation and Resentment 52:28 Talent and Resentment 59:16 Playing the Victim? 1:08:20 Hollywood's Shifting Star Power 1:20:37 The Art of Acting 1:26:55 Behind the Scenes of Baby Jane 1:33:19 The Real-Life Drama 1:40:58 A Plea for Quality Modern-Day Cinema 1:44:07 Listener Engagement and Future Topics Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Civil War (2024) 54:31

4 weeks назад54:31

54:31

Sean gives his initial thoughts to Alex Garland's Civil War (2024). Discussion Points: -Sean was reminded of The Road (2009) and Nightcrawler (2014), with the intent of this film. -Typical American understatement. -Whether this film felt futuristic or not. -The strange sense of normality that people still adhere to, in the midst of a civil war. -Sean goes on tangent about Tesco. -The strange way they marketed the film. -How unexpectedly dark and gritty this film is. -America and foreign intervention. -The film's lack of answers or things to say. Raised Questions: -Did the marketing harm this film? -Where has Kirsten Dunst been? -Did the vague reasons for the war work for you? -Do you like a thought-provoking film? -Did you enjoy the "fantastically-at-odds with the horror" music choices? -Do you think the film fully-commits to the horror? Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
A Grand Day Out (1989 Wallace & Gromit Short Film) with Luke from 'The Howdy Beans Podcast!' 1:10:34

5 weeks назад1:10:34

1:10:34

Sean welcomes back massive friend of the show Luke, from The Howdy Beans Podcast! to discuss the first Wallace and Gromit film. What follows is a celebration of English television. With the shops shut on a Bank Holiday, A Grand Day Out (1989) sees an inventor Wallace and his pet dog Gromit travel to the moon in their home-made rocket ship, in order to replenish their cheese supplies. Because you can't have dry crackers can you? Discussion Points: -In the preamble, Sean and Luke still don't see eye to eye on Signs (2002), Bruce Willis's later film roles, and Gladiator II. -The genesis of Wallace and Gromit and the labour of love from Nick Park to get this film made. -"Let's bow to the inevitable"-Sean and Luke try to avoid tangents. -The size of Wallace's "door-stop" cheese slices. -Aardman films over the years. -The cooker on the moon and his dreams of skiing on Earth. -The death of Boomerang, CITV and Cartoon Network. -Luke is still disgusted with Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget (2023). -Luke and Sean discuss subsequent Wallace and Gromit films The Wrong Trousers (1993), A Close Shave (1995), The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005), A Matter of Loaf and Death (2008), and Vengeance Most Fowl (2024). Raised Questions: -How many aliases does Luke actually have? -Where's Sarah? -Do you need to describe Wallace and Gromit for the Americans? -Is it ridiculous to call this Wallace and Gromit, the one with the most unrealistic? -How did this film save an entire cheese? -Do you remember surround sound speakers around the room? -Is 'reverse-recency bias' a thing? -Is Moon Cheese just a different variety? Time stamps: 0:09 Introduction and Sighs 2:09 Signs Discussion 5:28 A Grand Day Out Overview 10:25 Nick Park and Aardman 12:05 Wallace and Gromit Characters 16:57 Animation Techniques 23:03 Peter Sallis and Voice Acting 28:08 Personal Memories of A Grand Day Out 30:32 Favorite Wallace and Gromit Films 37:49 Nostalgia and British Culture 55:14 Ending Reflections 1:01:04 Film Length and Experience 1:02:53 Aardman's Future and Challenges 1:08:15 Podcast Promotion and Closing Remarks Named TV Shows: -Creature Comforts (1989-Present). -Brum (1991-2002). -Mr Bean (1990-1995). -Open All Hours (1976-1985). -Still Open All Hours (2013-2019) -Come Outside (1993-1997). -Mr Benn (1971-1972). -Pingu (1990-2006). -The Clangers (1969-Present). -Fireman Sam (1987-Present). -Joshua Jones (1992). -William's Wish Wellingtons (1994-1996). -The Queen's Nose (1995-2003). -The Demon Headmaster (1996-1998, 2019). -My Parents Are Aliens (1999-2006). -Jungle Run (1999-2006). -50/50 (1997-2005). -Get Your Own Back (1991-2004). -Cow and Chicken (1995-1999). -The Cramp Twins (2001-2004). -Ed, Edd and Eddy (1999-2006). -Dexter's Lab (1996-1998, 2001-2003). -Recess (1997-2001). -The Powerpuff Girls (1998-2005) -Courage the Cowardly Dog (1999-2002). -Hole in the Wall Game Show (2008-2009). -Shaun the Sheep (2007-Present). Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Batman: The Killing Joke (2016) with Marie from '2 Girls 1 Reusable Cup Podcast' 1:17:13

6 weeks назад1:17:13

1:17:13

Sean is joined once again by Marie from '2 Girls, 1 Reusable Cup Podcast' and 'We Needed Roads' to lay into the poorly-executed Batman: The Killing Joke (2016). Discussion Points: -The DVD read-through returns. -Marie brings her comic book knowledge, whilst Sean brings his views without having read the comic. Neither were impressed. -The baffling creative choices behind this adaptation, particularly the horrific depiction of Barbara Gordon. -Sean questions Barbara Gordon's garment choices. -Marie and Sean discuss studios "subverting expectations". -The failure of the writers to write women properly. -Sean and Marie consider alternative story arcs for this film. -The glimpses of inspiration. -Marie thinks the animation was "lifeless" and misses the vibrant, dynamic look of the comic book. -THAT ending. -The awful post-credits scene. Raised Questions: -Why is Batman a cameo in his own film? -How did they get it so badly wrong? -Should they have bothered adapting this comic book? -We're here to see Batman, so where is he? -Did Luke from 'The Howdy Beans Podcast' appreciate the late night voice-message about this film? -Is Sean a bit of a contrarian? -Are you a fan of the Loony song? -Which line almost made Marie choke? *Sean was trying to think of Julianne Moore in The Fugitive. **Sean was thinking of Steve Kloves, who did all-but-one of the Harry Potter film screenplays. Chapters: 0:09 Introduction to The Killing Joke 3:19 The Killing Joke Overview 44:38 Dissecting the Controversy 1:14:12 Closing Thoughts on Adaptation Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Signs (2002) with co-host Sarah 2:46:07

7 weeks назад2:46:07

2:46:07

Sean and Sarah review one of their favourite films, M. Night Shyamalan's Signs (2002). They once again examine what the top critics think, before embarking on an in-depth dive into the film. Discussion Points: -The way this film divides people. -The Bad Reviews return! -The laser focus of this film. -Sean isn't happy to be taught how to pronounce a word by Sarah, someone from the South. -Sarah and Sean wonder if people trust mainstream critics anymore. -Whether people consider films art or content. -Studios treating the audience as if they are wrong. -The VERY outside interference in this film. -Sean and Sarah DISAGREE regarding a character. -Sarah thinks the time setting is ambiguous. -Merrill's 'miracle' and Graham's loss of faith. -The way that brothers (Graham and Merrill) interact. -The lack of a female role in the family. -Sean is horrified by the idea of a sequel to this film. Raised Questions: -Have you met anyone who is on the fence about this film? -Are you fed up of 'faffy' words in critic's reviews? -Why are reviews always trying to be funny? -Do people need to stop comparing this to 'The Sixth Sense' (1999)? -Why do people talk to Graham in a strange way? -Did the ending pay off for you? -Would Sarah and Sean's sarcasm be welcome in America? -How good is Cherry Jones? -Why won't the family call a vet? -Is this Mel Gibson's best performance? -Why does Sarah love a dinner party scene? -Do the aliens have a sense of vengeance? -What is the film actually about? Time stamps: 0:20 Introduction to Film Reviews 1:39 Chasing the Right Tone 3:05 Bad Reviews and Polarizing Opinions 7:38 Diving into Rotten Tomatoes 11:22 Critics’ Takes on Signs 11:31 The Weight of Expectations 16:15 Critiquing Film Criticism 27:34 Audience Reactions to Signs 47:52 Analysing Character Dynamics 52:01 The Emotional Core of the Film 59:16 Themes of Grief and Loss 1:06:16 Community Responses to Crisis 1:18:50 The Timelessness of Signs 1:24:15 Eerie Settings and Rural America 1:32:02 Notable Characters and Their Impact 1:38:29 The Role of Communication 2:01:11 Emotional Connections and Relationships 2:14:47 The Alien Threat Emerges 2:27:41 Regaining Faith and Purpose 2:34:32 Critiquing Modern Cinema 2:42:06 Reflections on Humanity and Hope 2:43:55 Final Thoughts and Farewells Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Batman: Under the Red Hood (2010) with Marie from '2 Girls 1 Reusable Cup Podcast' 1:35:23

8 weeks назад1:35:23

1:35:23

Marie from '2 Girls 1 Reusable Cup Podcast' and 'We Needed Roads Podcast' finally guests on Review It Yourself and what a film she picked! Batman: Under the Red Hood (2010). Warning, this episode contains spoilers. Discussion Points: -Sean and Marie discuss animated Batman films. -Marie lays out her relationship with Batman animated films and comics. -Sean explains his love of superhero films (no, really!). -The fantastic portrayal of the Joker. -The incredibly dark tone. -The great use of flashbacks. Raised Questions: -Is this one of the best Batman films ever? -Are animated films under less scrutiny and pressure? -Why was Sean so impressed by Fantastic Four: The Rise of the Silver Surfer (2007)? -Have we had "too much of a good thing" with superhero films? -How long has it been since Sean vented about 'The Batman'? -What the hell is Night Wing doing for half the films? -Is the Red Hood trying to kill Batman or not? Sean Recommends: Gladiator II (2024). Timestamps: 0:05 Welcome to Review It Yourself 1:22 Introducing Batman: Under the Red Hood 4:57 Exploring Animated Batman Films 11:32 The Joker's Brutal Nature 33:41 The Complexity of Bruce Wayne 46:25 The Mystery of the Red Hood 47:53 Characters Matter 49:23 A Labour of Love 49:32 The Training of Jason Todd 54:06 The Joker's Chaos 55:56 Emotional Turmoil 59:09 The Al Ghul Connection 1:02:35 The Final Showdown 1:07:31 The Impact of Loss 1:09:50 A New Direction 1:18:22 The Dangers of CGI 1:22:05 Future of DCU 1:22:49 The Penguin's Potential 1:25:47 Thoughts on Gladiator 2 1:31:50 Where to Find Marie Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Tropic Thunder (2008) with Josh, Alex, Will and Luke from 'This Isn't Life' 56:19

9 weeks назад56:19

56:19

Sean is joined by Josh, Alex, Will and Luke from 'This Isn't Life' Podcast to review one of the best comedies of recent memory: Tropic Thunder (2008). Discussion Points: -Sean gets the This Isn't Life guys to introduce themselves. -The guys and Sean discuss the reason for why this film wouldn't get made now. -How Hollywood lost the ability to laugh at itself. -Sean details how context is key. -A '50 Shades of Grey' Would You Rather? Question. -Whether you could pitch a film like this now. -Josh, Alex, Will and Luke recommend Eyes Wide Shut (1999). -Sean and the guys discuss the Moon Landings and if it's real or not, and barely avoid a discussion about lizard people. Raised Questions: -Is this Robert Downey Jr.'s best film? -What's Loyd Grossman got to do with this film? -What happened between 2008 and now to change people's sensibilities? -How badly does Christian Grey act towards his girlfriend? -Is this film one of the funniest films ever made? -What's your favourite bit of the film? -When did you last see a side-splitting comedy in the cinemas? Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Final Destination 5 (2011) with co-host Sarah 1:51:23

10 weeks назад1:51:23

1:51:23

Sean and Sarah reach the Final Destination (for now) of the franchise, with the oddly-fantastic Final Destination 5 (2011). Discussion Points: -Sean compares this series to the Jaws franchise. -Sarah wonders how The Final Destination (2009) turned out so badly. -Sean moans about modern-day films and the rising cost of visiting the cinema. -The importance of a gut-instinct when picking which film to see. -Sarah and Sean wonder how on Earth this fifth film became, arguably, the best film in the series. -Sean and Sarah clash over whether the evening meal is "your tea" or "your dinner". -Sean debuts his cockney impression. -Which character steals the show. -Sarah questions whether the setting of the film and whether they manage to pull it off and make it believable. -Sarah loved how the film gave the characters time to react to this horrific event and began to question the current trajectory of their lives. -Seeing grief push Peter onto a very dark path. -Sean recorded this episode with a cold, hence the breathiness. Raised Questions: -How did they do this? -Do you remember the 3-D craze? -Does anyone care about the preamble in these films? -Why don't Sean and Sarah review more modern films on the podcast? -Why do studios continue to "subvert audiences expectations" all the time? -"I thought you'd just had your tea?"-Sean questions Sarah's digestive distress. -When are they going to have someone British in this franchise? -Did you see the twist coming? -Was making the survivors group co-workers a genius move? Thank You to Ben from 'Push Pull Health' and Ryan Walker from 'The Walk The Line Podcast'. Time Stamps: 0:10 Welcome to Review It Yourself 3:32 A Return to Basics for the Franchise 5:57 The Cost of Cinema 7:36 Modern Films and Audience Expectations 11:03 Meet the Characters 16:31 Time Travel or Prequel? 22:53 The Ripple Effect of Tragedy 30:36 The Bridge Disaster 40:58 Reactions to Tragedy 46:27 Humour in Dark Situations 52:20 Hidden References and Clues 54:17 Film Quality Contrast 57:12 Gymnastics Scene Impact 1:03:12 Turning Safe Spaces Horrific 1:06:09 Eye Surgery Tensions 1:08:25 Unconventional Villain Development 1:14:31 Dark Twists and Confrontations 1:30:47 Plane Crash Call back 1:42:32 Nostalgic Technology References 1:48:49 Listener Engagement and Reflections Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Misery To The World: Doctor Who Christmas Special 2024 20:00

11 weeks назад20:00

20:00

Sean does his best to put together a coherent review for the Doctor Who Christmas Special 2024, but it's fair to say, he wasn't impressed. Sean likens the episode to "a sh*t sandwich from a corner shop". Discussion Points: -Sean discusses why he can't be bothered to review Doctor Who anymore. -If you make good TV, people will watch it. -The issues with pacing. -Using a fly to introduce a character's name. -The lack of seriousness in Doctor Who now. -The part of the episode that Sean found distasteful. Raised Questions: -What was all this all about? -Has Ncuti Gatwa been miscast? -Is this episode soulless? -Why is Doctor Who so political now? -Why did this episode feel like a bottle-episode? Shout-outs: -The Nerdstalgic Podcast. -The Sense Sphere. Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
Jack Frost (1998) 2:34:35

11 weeks назад2:34:35

2:34:35

Merry Christmas from Sean and Sarah! Join them for an extended look into the 1998 Christmas Classic Jack Frost (1998). Sean and Sarah wonder why this film was decimated by critics but loved by audiences. They unusually look at the criticisms from around the time the film came out and address the ridiculous views of the critics. Is Jack Frost (1998) really 'sloppy', 'repulsive', 'charm-less', 'preachy', 'manipulative' and does it 'prove that Hollywood is in the hands of the minions of Satan'? Discussion Points: -Sean and Sarah spend the first 30 minutes reading bad reviews. -Sean destroys any chance of ever becoming a Rotten Tomatoes critic. -Sarah and Sean compare the rating of Jack Frost (1998) and Captain Marvel (2019). -Why people ignore 'professional critics' nowadays, in favour of Podcasters and YouTubers. -Sean brings Luke from The Nerdstalgic Podcast opinion's into the discussion. -Whether or not a film can be 'over-emotional'. -The loss of a male role model. -Sarah watches the film's trailer for the first time. -Sarah and Sean discuss father and son/mother and son family dynamics. -The quiet strength of Gabby Frost. -Sean and Sarah discuss their traditional Christmas films. Raised Questions: -Which rating did Sarah think was "f*cking criminal"? -Do the reviews about this film disgust you as much as they did to Sarah and Sean? -Have you ever met anyone who is negative about this film? -How many times does Sean take aim at how Americans spell English words? -Do you think this film "ticks all the Christmas boxes"? -How had Sarah never seen this before? -Should Mac have been there at the end? -Did you like that Charlie comes out fighting with a hairdryer? -What do you think of Elf (2003)? -Is the film "a little bit too Disney Channel' at times? Random Film Recommendation: -The Perfect Storm (2000). Random Tangent: -Lindt chocolate: Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
The China Syndrome (1979) 1:44:22

12 weeks назад1:44:22

1:44:22

Sean and Sarah continue their nuclear film exposure, with 1979's The China Syndrome; a tale about the power of the media, the dangers of nuclear energy and the effects of corporate indifference and greed. Released just 12 days before the real 'Three-Mile Island' nuclear incident, this film was discussed by everybody in 1979. Sean and Sarah wonder whether this brilliant film has had the cultural impact that it should have had, before delving into what the modern day film industry is failing at (It's pretty much everything). Discussion Points: -The DVD read-through returns. -The almost-perfect timing of the film. -Sarah wonders about the impact of timing, how this film "was everywhere but then nowhere", similar to Avatar (2009). -The impeccable writing and the intelligence of all the characters. -Sarah and Sean struggle to explain just how good this film is. -"We can't go back to living like Hermits", Sean wades into the debate around the future of energy. -Sean and Sarah name their price to give up work for a year and just watch modern films. -The death of "taking-a-risk" films. Raised Questions: -Has this film been forgotten? -Does the title (meaning nuclear meltdown) harm the film? -Do you love films that show the behind-the-scenes "manic-ness" of live broadcasting? -Is there anything more ominous than a shaking cup of tea? -Would a soundtrack have been out of place? -Is Sarah incoherent? -What was the film Sean saw at a mystery screening?* Events: -The San Bernadino Train Crash and 'The Duffy Street Incident' (1989). -The accidents on American Airlines Flight 96 (DC-10) and United Airlines Flight 811 (747), and the crash of Turkish Airline Flight 981 (DC-10) when cargo doors failed. -Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station partial nuclear meltdown on 28th March 1989. -Dresden Nuclear Power Plant 'false high pressure signal' incident on June 5th 1970. -"Counterfeit Plane Parts": The crash of Partnair Flight 394 (CV-580). *The film that Sean thought was "bloody awful" was Joy Ride (2023). Time Stamps: 0:08 Welcome to Review It Yourself 1:22 The China Syndrome Overview 5:36 Exploring the Title's Meaning 8:13 Behind the Scenes of Broadcasting 13:18 The Characters and Their Dynamics 19:17 The Nuclear Incident Unfolds 25:14 Tension Builds in the Control Room 35:07 Corporate Greed versus Safety 43:23 The Cultural Context of Nuclear Power 46:44 The Climax: Racing Against Time 50:27 The Final Confrontation and Truth Revealed 51:44 The Interview Distraction 52:52 Consequences of Choices 54:37 The Complexity of Storytelling 56:47 The Pressure of Public Speaking 59:11 The Weight of Communication 1:01:20 The Tragic Break 1:04:06 The Nuclear Dilemma 1:05:10 The Value of Depth 1:15:05 Intentional Filmmaking 1:30:08 Enjoyable Cinema Experiences 1:34:30 Disappointment in Modern Films 1:36:09 The State of Current Filmmaking 1:39:16 The Quest for Quality Films 1:43:37 A Call for Support Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

1
The Final Destination (2009) with Ryan Walker from 'The Walk The Line Podcast' 1:09:27

13 weeks назад1:09:27

1:09:27

Review It Yourself's first ever guest returns! Ryan Walker from 'The Walk The Line Podcast' joins Sean and Sarah to discuss the fourth (and planned last) film: The Final Destination (2009). Will Ryan and Sarah remain unimpressed by Sean's choice of film? Check Out Ryan's website here: https://www.thewalkthelinepodcast.com/ Discussion Points: -Ryan is practising for Loose Women or This Morning, after his BBC Radio Essex Interview. -Sarah was unimpressed by this film. -The way the film jettisons everything that Sarah loved, plot, characters etc. -The lack of importance for the women's names. -Ryan loved the tyre death. -CGI ruins the party, again. -Treat yourself to the deleted scenes. -The really poor script. -The 'Death By Caffeine' Coffee Shop rubbish coffee puns. -This film is so good that Ryan, Sean and Sarah start discussing Commando (1985): "90 minutes of pure adrenaline"-Ryan Walker. -Ryan is annoyed at the CGI dust. -We do not endorse spreading hate, we were laughing at the idiotic guy-just in case you missed the sarcasm, nuance and humour. -Sean is outraged that the main character doesn't get his face spattered with blood. Raised Questions: -What's with Sean's saucy introduction? -Did you know there were 5 Final Destination films? -Did the film go totally go off the rails with this one? -What is with the acting? -Are we supposed to die? -How strong was that fence? -Did death save the best for 3-D? -Why is Sean against the C-word? -Why did they use George's backstory like that? -Why are the visions so rubbish? -Why does no-one emotionally react to any of the deaths in this film? -Why don't they go for a cheeky Greggs? -Would a Final Destination spoof, similar to Scream (1996) work? Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
The Indian in the Cupboard (1995) with Savon 1:02:07

14 weeks назад1:02:07

1:02:07

Savon, formerly of Coffee and Comments podcast, returns to review a classic film, The Indian in the Cupboard (1995). Based on the 1980 book by Lynne Reid Banks, the story sees Omri, a young kid who lives in New York City, discover his cupboard brings his toy American Indian to life. Discussion Points: -How the book became a staple of British Primary Schools. -The DVD read-through returns. -Sean is confused by American foods. -Savon and Sean discuss the differences between the book and the film adaptation. -Savon describes how 90's the film feels and was surprised to see an Abacus. -The differences between the book and the film adaptation. -The tumultuous story of the American West. -Savon and Sean discuss the unexpected emotional depth in the film. Raised Questions: -Who chooses the books you read at Primary (Elementary) school? -Why do we read so many American based stories in Britain? -Do Americans get fed up with films based in New York? -Is this film more 'Field of Dreams' (1989) than 'Toy Story' (1995)? -What happened to skating in films? Corrections: -*Frank OZ played Yoda in the Star Wars films, not C3PO. -*Alan Abernathy was the character in Small Soldiers, not Lewis. Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Final Destination 3 (2006) with Ben from 'Push Pull Health' 1:28:55

15 weeks назад1:28:55

1:28:55

Ben from 'Push Pull Health' returns to the podcast after two years, complete with booing, to help Sarah and Sean review Final Destination 3 (2006). Discussion Points: -Sarah feels this film is a return to form after Final Destination 2 (2003). -The solid opener with the rollercoaster crash. -Ben thinks the characters are "awful" and "stink". -The shocking amount of times Wendy gets her face spattered with blood. -Little Timmy from Final Destination 2. -The return of the memorial service. -Sean thinks there were too many 'splatty' deaths. -Sarah, Sean and Ben wonder how the series managed to stay fresh. Raised Questions: -Has Sean sold out? -Is Ben worth the wait? -Why didn't Ben feel as nostalgic about this film as he thought he would? -Are we meant to care about these characters? -How long is the duration of the premonition? -Would you prefer Sarah to calmly tell you that she's had a premonition? -How many times does the word 'derailed' get used? -Was it a good idea to go with a primarily all-teenage cast again? -Were you rooting for Wendy? -How many baby wipes is Wendy using? -What's with that gym? Time Stamps: 0:08- Welcome to Review It Yourself 0:49- The Return of Ben 2:02- Final Destination 3 Discussion 3:53- Tanning Booth Death 6:55- The Characters and Their Fates 9:56- Deaths and CGI Effects 15:51- The Roller Coaster Incident 17:55- The Gym Scene 22:24- Memorial Service Chaos 26:50- The Next Fatalities 28:55- The Train Disaster 36:09- Exploring the Deaths 37:59- The Final Train Scene 40:10- Reflections on the Franchise 40:30- Anticipating Future Instalments 48:28- The Podcast Journey 51:17- The Future of Horror Films 55:14- Wrapping Up the Discussion 1:05:32- Closing Remarks and Thanks Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
'The Last Signals [Titanic Independent Film]' with Actor, Writer and Director Thomas Lynskey. 1:00:58

16 weeks назад1:00:58

1:00:58

Thomas Lynskey, actor, writer, and director of The Last Signals joins Sean to discuss the story behind the making of his independent film. The film explores the actions Titanic’s wireless operators, Senior Operator John ‘Jack’ Phillips and Junior Operator Harold Bride, throughout Titanic's voyage. The story of the making of the film is as amazing as the film itself, as Tom describes how his family and friends worked to bring the film to life! My Guest: The Last Signals is available on Tom's YouTube Channel 'Part Time Explorer': https://www.youtube.com/@PartTimeExplorer Discussion Points: -The incredible collaborative effort it took to build the sets, assemble the cast, and scout the locations over two years! -The inspiration behind the film, the 'geeks' of 1912, the wireless operators, and why Tom didn't originally plan to star in the film. -The length Tom and the cast went to, to achieve historical accuracy. Raised Questions: -Do limited resources create the need for creative film-making? -Where did the inspiration for the film come from? -How did the cast end up filming from 2am-4am in a Titanic museum? -Will the footage of Tom's Dad as Senator Smith ever be released? -Was there a culture of defending fellow White Star crewmen who died during the disaster? -What can you do to make your parent's pool look like the North Atlantic on screen? Massive Thanks to Marv from 'Pods Like Us' and Ryan Walker from 'The Walk The Line Podcast' for their advice about interview podcast episodes. Go check out their awesome podcasts! Time Stamps: 0:05-Welcome to Review It Yourself 4:01-The Last Signals Overview 9:13-Filming Challenges and Set Design 15:10-The Story Behind the Characters 23:10-Accents and Performances 31:57-Exploring Historical Accuracy 40:54-The Impact of the Collision 47:14-The Fate of the Wireless Operators 51:30-Current Projects and Future Endeavours 57:57-Closing Thoughts and Reflections Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Final Destination 2 (2003) with co-host Sarah 1:48:55

17 weeks назад1:48:55

1:48:55

Review It Yourself

1
Final Destination (2000) with co-host Sarah 1:17:09

18 weeks назад1:17:09

1:17:09

Sarah had never seen a single Final Destination film. Sean cleared the schedule to get these reviews done. Sarah will get her own back soon with 'Sarah decides'. Will Sarah remain unimpressed by Sean's choice of film? Discussion Points: -Sean nearly gets killed by a bookcase. -Sarah was surprised by how good this film was. -The origin of the film's premise. -Sean tries not to spoil any of the upcoming sequels for Sarah. -How well-written the characters are in this film. -Sean apologises for his use of the word 're-writed'. -The brilliant practical effects. -Sarah enjoyed the lingering deaths, as opposed to the 'blink and miss it' deaths seen in Alien Romulus. -The depiction of survivors guilt. -Sarah talks about looking into a bus driver's eyes. Raised Questions: -Where's the Woo-Woo Sarah? -Should you set off Party Poppers during a podcast episode? -Do you enjoy teen-focused horror films? -Does this film feel like an extended, early season episode of Buffy for you? -Does death have a design for us all? -How did this avoid being another sh*tty teen-angst horror film? -Did the Final Destination series ever drop the ball? *-James Wan did the Saw films, not James Wong. Coming Soon: -Final Destination 2 (2003). -Final Destination 3 (2006). -The Final Destination (2009). -Final Destination 5 (2011). Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Threads (1984) 1:16:57

19 weeks назад1:16:57

1:16:57

This is a grim one, but it's a film you need to see! A British kitchen sink drama set in Sheffield in 1983, which follows a young couple expecting their first child before a nuclear war interrupts their plans. Sean and Sarah review one of the most-unflinching and best British TV films of all time. Will they remain unimpressed by their choice of film? Warning: This podcast episodes contains descriptions of some of the shocking events in the film. Discussion Points: -Sarah and Sean forgot how bleak this film is. -How timely this film feels in 2024, even though it was made in 1984. -The impact of this film when it was first released. -How unnerving this film is. -Sean wonders whether they should have chosen this film. -The British Soap Creme-de-le-creme of actors. -Just how much the British underestimated the impact of a nuclear bomb. -Sarah debuts her Northern impression. -Sarah discusses the power of background events bubbling over so "abruptly and quickly", describing it as "masterful" and "amazing". -Sarah describes the power of the small character moments, which make the film so special. -The effects on the post-war generation and the complete lack of social cohesion is highlighted by Sarah. -Sean wonders if humans would become functionally extinct; when a species reaches such a low level of members that it will inevitably become extinct, as it is unable to replenish it's numbers. Raised Questions: -Will this film change the trajectory of your day? -How bad is Sean's Sheffield accent? -Is there anything better than an upper class English voice heralding your doom? -Does watching this film make you extra British? -Why did they show Threads (1984) to school children? -Does this film make you want to stop making jokes? -Was this film the death knell for many high street shops? -Did they need to make it seem survivable? -It's not good when they quietly store away the paintings is it? -Is this the best thing that the BBC has ever made? Thanks for Listening! Get in touch: We would love to hear your thoughts on Threads (1984). Let us know what you thought of the film and our podcast review! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Rush Hour 2 (2001) with Randy & Steve from 'The Decision Reel' 53:49

20 weeks назад53:49

53:49

Randy and Steve return to continue the Rush Hour reviews with Rush Hour 2 (2001). Watch your egg rolls, we're going in! Discussion Points: -Sean's notes are abysmal again. -The lack of seriousness in this film. -Chris Tucker's dancing. -The reason Jackie Chan doesn't like the way he speaks in English in this film. -A brief history of '7 11' shops (Not Sponsored). -Behind the biggest mouth in the West is a damn good cop with Tucker. -Steve thinks this film is better than the original film. Raised Questions: -Does this film start straight after Rush Hour? -The most obvious bomb-planting scene ever? -What is the British version of a '7 11'? -Where did they park the SS Minnow Johnson? -How has Randy never seen The Terminator (1984)? The impressions of Chris Tucker, Jackie Chan, Owen Wilson, Christopher Walken and President Donald Trump (You weren't expecting him were you!) are purely imitations of the performances in the film, or in real life, and not said with any malicious intent and no offence is meant. The impressions of President Donald Trump are not any remark about American Politics, this is a English podcast, we're not interested. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Float (2019) with Luke from 'The Nerdstalgic Podcast' 50:13

21 weeks назад50:13

50:13

Luke from 'The Nerdstalgic Podcast' returns to join Sean and discuss the Disney-Pixar short film, Float (2019). Float is a short six-minute film which highlights the importance of difference and acceptance, by following a Father coming to terms with his young son, who 'floats'. Chapters: 0:00-Welcome and Introduction of this Week's Guest. 25:51-The Power of Acceptance. 45:07-The Impact of Representation. 50:20-Closing Thoughts and Recommendations. Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Jojo Rabbit (2019) with Jackson from 'History with Jackson' 1:32:32

22 weeks назад1:32:32

1:32:32

Jackson from 'History with Jackson' joins Sean to discuss one of his favourite films: Jojo Rabbit (2019). Jackson and Sean use the film as a framework to delve into the world of Nazi Germany, totalitarian regimes and how this film stays funny and effective, whilst dealing with such a grim subject matter. Guest: https://historywithjackson.co.uk/ Discussion Points: -The unique and weird tone of the film. -Jackson and Sean discuss some of the criticism aimed at the film. -The power of humour. -Sean compares the films opening to Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (1997). -Sean and Jackson dive into totalitarian regimes, indoctrination and the cult of personalities. -Taika Watiti's portrayal of Adolf Hitler. -The lasting memory of Occupation. -The role of women in Nazi Germany. -The strong performances and dialogue of Jojo Rabbit. -The power of 'doing what we can' and the power of love. Raised Questions: -Do overwhelming positive reviews put you off seeing a film? -How do you tackle such a depressing and serious subject? -Is this film a good place to introduce this subject to new generations? -Does a good cast guarantee a good film? -Which line did Sean really not like? -Why didn't Nazi Germany collapse sooner? -Did you expect an Augustus Gloop impression in this review? -How is this film THIS funny, given the subject matter? -Has the term 'Nazi' been diluted and devalued? Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy 2 (2000) with Peter Rose from 'Mummy Movie Podcast' 1:02:15

22 weeks назад1:02:15

1:02:15

As Sarah is feeling under the weather, Sean is joined by Peter Rose to review Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy 2 (2000). The film was originally released as 'Ancient Evil: Scream of the Mummy' in America and Mexico, and has no links to 'Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy' (1998). Welcome to Review It Yourself: The Podcast with the Sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed. Will Sean and Peter be impressed or unimpressed? Discussion Points: -Sometimes you've just got to be brutally honest. -Peter and Sean do their best to find the positives. -The DVD blurb reading returns, and the DVD chapters are discovered. -The sheer lack of preservation protocol in this film. -Peter brings interesting facts about Aztecs. Raised Questions: -How did Sean watch this multiple times on Sky Movies? -Is this a "So-bad-it's-good" film? -How can an 85 minute film feel so slow? -When did 'Animated Menu' stop being classed as a DVD Special Feature? -Is this film a "Pound Shop Version of Halloween H20"? -Why would you kick a door open when you're trying to put something back secretly? -After 100 Mummy film reviews, what is the worst film Peter has watched? Recommendations: -Rough Air: Danger on Flight 534 (2001). Sean has already reviewed this film if you want to check it out. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Preview It Yourself 4: Gladiator II (2024) 47:23

23 weeks назад47:23

47:23

Which film trailer/previews make you want to spend your hard earned cash at the cinema? Let Sean and Sarah help with that, by reviewing trailers for upcoming films and a few old favourites. Welcome to Preview it Yourself. This time around, Sean decides to show Sarah the trailer for Gladiator II (2024). He apologises first. Discussion Points: -Lower your expectations. -The long muted Gladiator sequel ideas. -The justification for making the film. -The horrendous soundtrack for the trailer and why Hans Zimmer hasn't returned to score this film. -Whether the cast can elevate this film like Russell Crowe did with the original. -Sean and Sarah also review the Gladiator (2000) trailer. -A mini-review of The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008). -Sarah and Sean try to remain positive. -The downgrade from tiger to rhinoceros. -Sean and Sarah agree to eat humble pie if the film is good. Raised Questions: -Is it mean to make someone watch this trailer? -Have we gone backwards in making films? -Who the hell signed off on the music? -Why does the trailer make the film seem like a pantomime? -Why would you even dare to make a sequel to such a behemoth of cinema? -Would you watch "Aqueduct Shark"? -Did the Romans ever have two Emperors at once? -Is the cast of Gladiator II too big? -Why does Sarah refuse to go camping? Quotes of the episode: -"What the f**k is this film meant to be?". -"If this film is better than Gladiator (2000) then I will shut the podcast down". -"This is so 2024 it hurts...what are you doing!?". -"I'm making a lot of assumptions on [an awful] trailer". -"I don't think people know how to make trailers anymore". Shout-out to Dan from Casting Views for his feedback on this Preview It Yourself side-series. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Jaws: The Revenge (1987) with Paul from 'History Rage' 1:10:10

24 weeks назад1:10:10

1:10:10

Sean, Sarah and Paul from 'History Rage' reach the final, pitiful end of the Jaws franchise. Discussion Points: -Sean didn't feel this was that bad. -The DVD read-through returns. -Paul finds the DVD cover description hilarious. -The serious lack of deaths in this film. -Sarah sends her thoughts in for Paul and Sean to discuss. -Sean was really with the film... for 12 minutes. -Sean compares the sharks in Jaws and Jaws: The Revenge to pigeons. -Paul and Sean can't abide the Michael Brody character. -Sean doesn't like being pestered. Raised Questions: -Did Sean watch a different film? -Has Sarah binned off the podcast for work or because it's Jaws: The Revenge? -Where are the deaths? -Can Ellen Brody actually cry? -How many flashback does a 90-minute film need? -How much do they love Christmas in Amity? -Why does the coffin look so fake? -Is the shark nose-heavy? -Is your Dad a binfluencer? -Why "Tourist on the Loose"? Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Discussing 'The Dambusters' (1955) with Dr. Dan Ellin 1:24:20

25 weeks назад1:24:20

1:24:20

Dr. Dan Ellin, Historian and Archivist from the International Bomber Command Centre, joins Sean to discuss The Dam Busters (1955). Discussion Points: -Dan discusses his love/hate relationship with the film and it's portrayal of Operation Chastise. -The absence of major motion pictures about RAF Bomber Command. -The importance of collective memory regarding the Second World War. -The use of the Dam Busters march at 'Bomber' Harris's funeral. -The enemies in the film: bureaucrats, Whitehall and red tape. -The fantastic casting in the film. -The incredible flying during the making of the film. -Putting RAF Bomber Command into historical context. -The lack of the raid on the Sorpe Dam in the film. -The impact of the Official Secrets Act on the film. -Sean does his best to translate very English aspects of the film for American listeners. -The optics of history and the loss of nuance. -The influence on this film on George Lucas when he was making Star Wars (1977). -The things that Britain leans back on in times of adversity. Raised Questions: -Do people see RAF Bomber Command as either 'Dam Busters or Dresden'? -Are the historical details faithfully intact? -How important are myths to a country? -Was it really difficult for Barnes Wallis to get the idea for the raid accepted? -Why do the British love an underdog story? -Did the Americans have better PR and spin? -Would you love to see Peter Jackson's The Dam Busters? -Does the film tell the story of what happened rather than what was meant to happen? -Why is Guy Gibson portrayed a certain way in the film? -Does the film lack nuance? -Does the film serve as a good starting point for people who may not know the story of the Dam Busters raid? Further Reading Recommendations: -'Guy Gibson' by Richard Morris. -'Dam Buster Barnes Wallis: An Engineers Life' by Richard Morris. -'The Fire' (Original Title: Der Brand) by Jorg Friedrich. -'The Strategic Air Offensive Against Germany' by Noble Frankland and Charles Webster. -The Weirdstone of Brisingamen (1960) and Elidor (1965) by Alan Garner. Film/Documentary Recommendations: -They Shall Not Grow Old (2018). -Dambusters Declassified (2010) with Martin Shaw. -Inspector George Gently (2007-2017). -Judge John Deed (2001-2007). -The Guns of Navarone (1961). -The Heroes of Telemark (1965). -The Carling Black Label adverts. Podcast Recommendations: -History Rage. -Never Mind The Dambusters. Thanks for Listening! Find us here: X: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Jaws 3-D (1983) with Paul from 'History Rage' 1:13:38

25 weeks назад1:13:38

1:13:38

Sean, Sarah and Paul from History Rage are here to continue our Jaws series, it's downwards and downwards for Jaws 3-D (1983). Will Sean, Sarah and Paul be impressed or unimpressed with the film? Stick around for 'The Worst Shark Film You've Ever Seen' section, with responses from podcast friends of Review It Yourself. Discussion Points: -Sarah went from Jaws (1975) to Jaws 3-D (1983). -Sean paid £2.49 to rent this film and still didn't get his money's worth. -Paul discusses the Victorian Invention of 3-D and wonders why we haven't mastered it yet. -The dreadful water skiers and the obsession with millions of gallons of water. -The Brody family ageing phenomenon continues. -The idiocy of putting a shark in a petting pen. Raised Questions: -Is this the perfect litmus test for a podcast? -How did this get into cinemas? -Why is the transfer so bad? -How is that floating fish head still alive? -How on Earth did SeaWorld approve being in this film? -Can Leah Thompson cure aquaphobia? -Did Mike and Katherine ever go to Venezuela? -Do you have "Prometheus (2012) levels of disdain" for your audience? Thank You for your contributions: -'The Podcast That Wouldn't Die'. -'Sci-Fi Chronicles YouTube Channel'. -'Stew World Order' podcast. -'Coffee and Comments YouTube Channel'. -'Cinnamon Toast Crunch YouTube Channel'. -'Seismic Cinema' podcast. -'Talking SMAC: Superheroes, Movies, Animations and Comics Podcast'. -'Dissect That Film' podcast. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Review It Yourself

1
Jaws 2 (1978) with Paul from 'History Rage' 1:00:07

26 weeks назад1:00:07