Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
1
The 2024 Presidential Election
1:06:25
1:06:25
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:06:25
So you've won/lost the 2024 Presidential election, what comes next? Brett and Nazim take some time to vet out what the 2024 election means for the President, the Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies. Sprinkle in a touch of doom, and just a hint of gloom, and you've got a winning podcast episode. Law starts from the beginning, with a healthy ta…
…
continue reading
1
Duncan Sinclair, et al. v. Venezia Turismo, Venice Limousine S.R.L, Narduzzi E Solemar S.L.R. (40696)
1:58:46
1:58:46
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:58:46
The appellants, Duncan and Michelle Sinclair, and their son were on a European holiday and were injured in an accident in Venice, Italy. They were passengers on a water taxi that crashed into a wooden structure. The appellants were both injured. The appellants had arranged their travels through Amex Canada Inc., operating under the name Centurion T…
…
continue reading
1
Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank
1:43:35
1:43:35
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:43:35
A case in which the Court will decide whether risk disclosures are false or misleading when they do not disclose that a risk has materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm.
…
continue reading
1
Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank
1:28:57
1:28:57
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:28:57
Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated BankSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Just days before the election, the Supreme Court ruled Virginia will be able to continue to purge people from the state's voter rolls. The state has argued it is part of an effort to remove noncitizens from the rolls, but voting rights advocates have found several U.S. citizens were also removed from the rolls at the same time. Amna Nawaz discussed…
…
continue reading
1
Bufkin v. McDonough, No. 23-713 [Arg: 10.16.2024]
1:12:45
1:12:45
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:12:45
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1), which directs the court to “take due account” of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ application of that rule. ★ Su…
…
continue reading
1
Government of Saskatchewan – Minister of Environment v. Métis Nation – Saskatchewan, et al. (40740)
2:21:20
2:21:20
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:21:20
The respondents, Métis Nation – Saskatchewan, and Métis Nation – Saskatchewan Secretariate Inc. (collectively, “the Métis respondents” or “MNS”), have long claimed Aboriginal title and rights (including commercial rights) to large areas of the Province of Saskatchewan. The appellant, Government of Saskatchewan, has consistently opposed the existenc…
…
continue reading
1
Izabela Piekut v. His Majesty the King in Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of National Revenue (40782)
2:33:22
2:33:22
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:33:22
Between September 1987 and October 1994, the appellant, Izabela Piekut, obtained a series of student loans through a federal government program. She graduated in 1994 and obtained her teaching diploma the following year. The appellant received two further student loans in 2002 and 2003, when she earned a master’s degree. In 2008, the appellant enro…
…
continue reading
1
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra
1:10:28
1:10:28
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:10:28
A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase “entitled… to benefits” includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received.
…
continue reading
1
E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera
42:10
42:10
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
42:10
A case in which the Court will decide whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence.
…
continue reading
1
Advocate Christ Medical v. Becerra, Sec. of H&HS
1:00:31
1:00:31
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:00:31
Advocate Christ Medical v. Becerra, Sec. of H&HSSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera
36:12
36:12
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
36:12
E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. CarreraSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
I.M. v. His Majesty the King (40868)
3:13:25
3:13:25
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
3:13:25
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) (CERTAIN INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC) The appellant participated in a planned robbery with intent to steal a firearm from a seventeen year old youth. He and his co-assailants attacked the victim outside his residence. They beat him and stabbed him. Their victim died from his wounds. The appellant and his co-ass…
…
continue reading
1
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. cv. United States, ex rel. Heath
1:33:56
1:33:56
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:33:56
A case in which the Court will decide whether reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal Communications Commission's E-rate program are “claims” under the False Claims Act.
…
continue reading
1
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S., ex rel. Heath
1:20:40
1:20:40
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:20:40
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S., ex rel. HeathSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Universities are disclosing the racial makeup of the first class of students admitted after the Supreme Court overturned affirmative action. The numbers give a detailed look at the impact of the ruling. While there's variation, analyses show Black enrollment is down at several colleges. Geoff Bennett discussed more with David Leonhardt of The New Y…
…
continue reading
1
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23-753 [Arg: 10.16.2024]
1:37:34
1:37:34
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:37:34
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges m…
…
continue reading
1
Medical Marijuana v. Horn, No. 23-365 [Arg: 10.15.2024]
1:08:18
1:08:18
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:08:18
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether economic harms resulting from personal injuries are injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant’s acts for purposes of a civil treble-damages action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, No. 23-583 [Arg: 10.15.2024]
49:20
49:20
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
49:20
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
His Majesty the King v. Jennifer Pan, et al. (40839)
2:50:06
2:50:06
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:50:06
Armed men entered the home of Jennifer Pan and her parents. They shot and killed Mrs. Pan. They shot and seriously injured Mr. Pan. Jennifer Pan, Mr. Wong, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Mylvaganam and Mr. Carty were charged with first degree murder and attempted murder. They were tried before a jury. Mid-trial, proceedings against Mr. Carty were severed. The j…
…
continue reading
1
Telus Communications Inc., et al. v. Federation of Canadian Municipalities, et al. (40776)
2:30:07
2:30:07
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:30:07
In February 2019, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (“CRTC” or “Commission”), issued Telecom Notice of Consultation 2019-57 for the purpose of initiating a broad review of mobile wireless services and their associated regulatory framework. The Commission indicated that the review would focus on three key areas, includi…
…
continue reading
1
Bufkin v. McDonough
1:12:44
1:12:44
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:12:44
A case in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1).
…
continue reading
1
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency
1:37:34
1:37:34
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:37:34
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which …
…
continue reading
1
San Francisco v. EPA
1:23:47
1:23:47
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:23:47
San Francisco v. EPASupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Bufkin v. McDonough, Sec. of VA
1:02:28
1:02:28
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:02:28
Bufkin v. McDonough, Sec. of VASupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn
1:08:18
1:08:18
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:08:18
A case in which the Court will decide whether economic harms resulting from personal injuries are injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant’s acts for purposes of a civil treble-damages action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria.
…
continue reading
1
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn
58:39
58:39
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
58:39
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. HornSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, Sec. of Homeland Security
42:21
42:21
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
42:21
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, Sec. of Homeland SecuritySupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Glossip v. Oklahoma, No. 22-7466 [Arg: 10.9.2024]
1:43:02
1:43:02
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:43:02
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the state’s suppression of the key prosecution witness’ admission that he was under the care of a psychiatrist and failure to correct that witness’ false testimony about that care and related diagnosis violate the due process of law under Brady v. Maryland and Napue v. Illinois; (2) whether the entirety of the suppre…
…
continue reading
1
Lackey v. Stinnie, No. 23-621 [Arg: 10.8.2024]
1:17:55
1:17:55
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:17:55
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether a party must obtain a ruling that conclusively decides the merits in its favor, as opposed to merely predicting a likelihood of later success, to prevail on the merits under 42 U.S.C. § 1988; and (2) whether a party must obtain an enduring change in the parties’ legal relationship from a judicial act, as opposed to a…
…
continue reading
1
Garland v. VanDerStok, No. 23-852 [Arg: 10.8.2024]
1:16:08
1:16:08
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:16:08
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether “a weapon parts kit that is designed to or may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive” under 27 C.F.R. § 478.11 is a “firearm” regulated by the Gun Control Act of 1968; and (2) whether “a partially complete, disassembled, or nonfunctional …
…
continue reading
1
Williams v. Washington, No. 23-191 [Arg: 10.7.2024]
1:15:51
1:15:51
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:15:51
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in state court. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger, No. 23-677 [Arg: 10.7.2024]
1:05:22
1:05:22
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:05:22
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether a post-removal amendment of a complaint to omit federal questions defeats federal-question subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331; and (2) whether such a post-removal amendment of a complaint precludes a district court from exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s remaining state-la…
…
continue reading
1
His Majesty the King v. Stuart Michael George Sabiston (40937)
58:55
58:55
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
58:55
During a search incident to arrest, a man told police that he had a firearm in his backpack. The officers subsequently seized a loaded prohibited firearm. The Crown ultimately stayed the charges from the initial arrest and proceeded to trial on firearms offences only. In a voir dire, the trial judge concluded that the police had breached the man’s …
…
continue reading
1
Mohamed Adam Bharwani v. His Majesty the King (40781)
2:48:47
2:48:47
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:48:47
After several years of deteriorating mental health, the appellant moved into a basement apartment with other tenants. Five days later, the appellant attacked one of the other tenants by striking her with a fireplace poker and then strangling her to death. The appellant called 9-1-1 saying that he wanted to turn himself in because he had just “kille…
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court heard arguments in a death row case from Oklahoma. Justices looked at whether the due process rights of death row inmate Richard Glossip were violated when the state suppressed information about its star witness who committed the murder. A court of criminal appeals has denied Glossip's appeal for a retrial. Oklahoma communities co…
…
continue reading
1
John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Government of Saskatchewan (Attorney General for Saskatchewan) (Day 2/2) (40608)
2:00:07
2:00:07
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:00:07
When an inmate is charged with a disciplinary offence in a Saskatchewan provincial correctional centre or remand centre, s. 68 of The Correctional Services Regulations requires the institutional authorities to determine, on a balance of probabilities, that the inmate committed that offence in order to find them responsible. Some of the penalties im…
…
continue reading
1
Glossip v. Oklahoma
1:43:02
1:43:02
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:43:02
A capital case in which the Court will decide whether to allow Oklahoma to execute Petitioner Richard Glossip after numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct and other errors, where even the state no longer defends the capital sentence.
…
continue reading
1
Glossip v. Oklahoma
1:28:29
1:28:29
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:28:29
Glossip v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court kicked off a new term of arguments with a major case focused on federal regulations of ghost guns. The justices weighed whether the government can regulate the firearms assembled at home with a kit with the same standard as other firearms made by licensed manufacturers. Geoff Bennett discussed more with News Hour Supreme Court ana…
…
continue reading
1
John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Government of Saskatchewan (Attorney General for Saskatchewan) (40608)
2:03:09
2:03:09
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:03:09
When an inmate is charged with a disciplinary offence in a Saskatchewan provincial correctional centre or remand centre, s. 68 of The Correctional Services Regulations requires the institutional authorities to determine, on a balance of probabilities, that the inmate committed that offence in order to find them responsible. Some of the penalties im…
…
continue reading
1
Garland v. VanDerStok
1:16:07
1:16:07
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:16:07
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has the authority to regulate so-called “ghost guns”—that is, firearms without serial numbers that can be assembled from parts.
…
continue reading
1
Lackey v. Stinnie
1:17:55
1:17:55
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:17:55
A case in which the Court will decide whether a party who obtains a preliminary injunction is a “prevailing party” for purposes of being entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.
…
continue reading
1
Lackey v. Stinnie
1:06:54
1:06:54
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:06:54
Lackey v. StinnieSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading