))
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May. You can listen to the sidebar version of each Supreme Court Case https://thesidebar.transistor.fm/
…
continue reading
A public good: every Supreme Court Oral Argument since 2010. Making the Highest Court more accessible for a modern audience. The DC Bar blog's piece about this podcast can be found here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotuspod. If you'd like to support the law student who created this project instead of studying you can do so here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotusguy. Thanks for listening! Patreon
…
continue reading
In under 30 minutes. Do you want to understand specific cases? We are here to provide commentary on every Supreme Court case.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
1
J.W. v. His Majesty the King (40956)
2:33:34
2:33:34
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:33:34
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) The appellant, an Indigenous man with significant cognitive difficulties, repeatedly sexually assaulted a worker at the group home where he resided. He remained in custody pending trial, including a period of detention in a psychiatric facility while temporarily unfit to stand trial. After resiling from three agreements to…
…
continue reading
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas (Decided December 10, 2024) In Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, the Supreme Court addressed whether federal courts have jurisdiction to review the revocation of a previously approved visa petition under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The case involved Amina Bouarfa, a U.S. citizen, whose petition for her noncitizen spouse was revoked …
…
continue reading
1
Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024]
12:33
12:33
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
12:33
The Supreme Court case, Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers. The core dispute centers on the calculation of disgorgement of profits under the Lanham Act, specifically whether a defendant's profits can include those of legally distinct affiliates. The petitioner argues that corporate separateness should be respected and that the lower courts erred …
…
continue reading
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. | 12/11/24 | Docket #: 23-900
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court heard arguments in a landmark case on transgender rights. The justices are weighing whether a Tennessee law barring gender-affirming care for minors violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. The decision will have major implications for young people who identify as transgender, their families and medical providers.…
…
continue reading
1
Tammy Marion Bouvette v. His Majesty the King (40780)
2:33:34
2:33:34
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:33:34
(SEALING ORDER) (CERTAIN INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC) The appellant, Tammy Marion Bouvette, was babysitting a 19-month old baby who died while having a bath. An autopsy was conducted by Dr. Evan Matshes. The appellant was charged with second degree murder. The appellant pleaded guilty to criminal negligence causing death. The British Co…
…
continue reading
1
Opsis Airport Services Inc. v. Attorney General of Québec, et al. (40786)
2:39:12
2:39:12
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:39:12
The appellant, Opsis Airport Services Inc., is a federal company that operates the emergency call dispatch centre at Pierre Elliot Trudeau International Airport. The respondent the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions charged Opsis with operating an enterprise that carried on private security activities without holding an agency licence of t…
…
continue reading
1
Dustin Kinamore v. His Majesty the King (40964)
2:42:11
2:42:11
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:42:11
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) Mr. Kinamore, when he was 22-years old, and the complainant, when she was 16-years old, met at a motorcycle shop and they exchanged messages for a few months. They met for dinner and a movie at Mr. Kinmore’s apartment. Afterwards, Mr. Kinamore was charged with sexual assault. Both the complainant and Mr. Kinamore testified…
…
continue reading
1
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024]
11:18
11:18
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
11:18
The Supreme Court case, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al. The central issue concerns the scope of environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for infrastructure projects. The justices debate the appropriate standard for determining which environmental impacts an agency must …
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court case, Feliciano v. Department of Transportation. This concerns the interpretation of a statute determining differential pay for reservists called to active duty during a national emergency. The petitioner argues that "during" implies a purely temporal connection, while the respondent contends it requires a substantive connection t…
…
continue reading
1
Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024]
1:26:52
1:26:52
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:26:52
The Supreme Court case, Kousisis v. U.S. The central issue is the interpretation of federal fraud statutes, specifically whether a property interest must be harmed to constitute property fraud. Petitioners argue that only cases involving actual economic loss qualify, while the government contends that any material misrepresentation resulting in the…
…
continue reading
1
Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024]
1:10:58
1:10:58
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:10:58
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network
…
continue reading
1
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024]
1:50:37
1:50:37
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:50:37
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network
…
continue reading
1
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024]
1:13:34
1:13:34
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:13:34
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network
…
continue reading
1
Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024]
1:26:52
1:26:52
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:26:52
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme; whether a sovereign’s statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; …
…
continue reading
1
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc.
1:10:57
1:10:57
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:10:57
A case in which the Court will decide whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates.
…
continue reading
1
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc.
1:00:56
1:00:56
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:00:56
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc.Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Seven County Coalition v. Eagle County | 12/10/24 | Docket #: 23-975
…
continue reading
1
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado
1:50:36
1:50:36
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:50:36
A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority.
…
continue reading
1
Seven County Coalition v. Eagle County
1:34:59
1:34:59
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:34:59
Seven County Coalition v. Eagle CountySupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Michael Paul Dunmore v. Raha Mehralian (41108)
2:17:00
2:17:00
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:17:00
The parties were married in June 2015. They lived in Japan until 2016 when they moved to the United Arab Emirates. They separated for a period in 2017, but reconciled in 2018 and then lived together in Oman until March 2020 when they travelled to Ontario for a number of reasons, including to visit Mr. Dunmore’s parents. They had planned to return t…
…
continue reading
Feliciano v. Dept. of Transportation | 12/09/24 | Docket #: 23-861
…
continue reading
Kousisis v. United States | 12/09/24 | Docket #: 23-909
…
continue reading
1
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation
1:13:33
1:13:33
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:13:33
A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency.
…
continue reading
1
Kousisis v. United States
1:26:52
1:26:52
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:26:52
A case in which the Court will consider the scope of property interests and fraud in government contracting, particularly when deception occurs without clear economic harm.
…
continue reading
Kousisis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Feliciano v. Dept. of Transportation
1:03:10
1:03:10
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:03:10
Feliciano v. Dept. of TransportationSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024]
16:06
16:06
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
16:06
This episode discusses the Supreme Court oral argument in the case United States v. Skrmetti. The case centers on the constitutionality of a Tennessee law (SB1) restricting access to gender-affirming care for minors. The petitioner argues SB1 constitutes unlawful sex discrimination, requiring heightened judicial scrutiny under the Equal Protection …
…
continue reading
1
U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024]
2:21:11
2:21:11
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:21:11
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1, which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the equal protection …
…
continue reading
1
Pascal Varennes v. His Majesty the King (40662)
2:25:35
2:25:35
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:25:35
In 2015, the appellant was charged with the second degree murder of his spouse. Before his trial, a Quebec Superior Court judge allowed his motion for the trial to take place before a judge alone, in accordance with s. 473(1) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, despite the absence of consent from the respondent prosecutor. The judge was of …
…
continue reading
1
Dorinela Pepa v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (40840)
2:23:46
2:23:46
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:23:46
Section 63(2) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (“IRPA”) provides foreign nationals who hold a permanent resident visa with the right to appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division (“IAD”) against a decision to make a removal order against them made under s. 44(2) or made at an admissibility hearing. In March 2018, the appellant, Dorinela…
…
continue reading
United States v. Skrmetti | 12/04/24 | Docket #: 23-477
…
continue reading
1
Republic of Hungary v. Simon, No. 23-867 [Arg: 12.3.2024]
1:24:02
1:24:02
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:24:02
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether historical commingling of assets suffices to establish that proceeds of seized property have a commercial nexus with the United States under the expropriation exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act; whether a plaintiff must make out a valid claim that an exception to the FSIA applies at the pleading stage, rat…
…
continue reading
1
U.S. v. Miller, No. 23-824 [Arg: 12.2.2024]
53:38
53:38
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
53:38
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a bankruptcy trustee may avoid a debtor’s tax payment to the United States under 11 U.S.C. § 544(b) when no actual creditor could have obtained relief under the applicable state fraudulent-transfer law outside of bankruptcy. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network
…
continue reading
1
Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, No. 23-1038 [Arg: 12.2.2024]
1:20:05
1:20:05
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:20:05
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred in setting aside the Food and Drug Administration’s orders denying respondents’ applications for authorization to market new e-cigarette products as arbitrary and capricious. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network
…
continue reading
1
Republic of Hungary v. Simon, No. 23-867 [Arg: 12.3.2024]
10:05
10:05
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
10:05
In a case of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The central dispute revolves around the interpretation of the FSIA's expropriation exception, specifically whether commingling of expropriated assets with a nation's general funds eliminates jurisdiction. The justices debate the meaning of "exchanged for" within the statute, exploring whethe…
…
continue reading
1
U.S. v. Miller, No. 23-824 [Arg: 12.2.2024]
23:46
23:46
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
23:46
In a case of United States v. Miller, concerning a bankruptcy trustee's attempt to recover fraudulent transfers. The core dispute centers on the interpretation of Section 106(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which waives sovereign immunity for certain code provisions, and how that waiver interacts with Section 544(b), allowing trustees to use state law t…
…
continue reading
1
Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, No. 23-1038 [Arg: 12.2.2024]
16:41
16:41
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
16:41
In a case of FDA's denial of applications for flavored e-cigarettes. The core issue is whether the FDA provided fair notice to the applicants regarding the required evidence for approval, specifically concerning the need to demonstrate sufficient benefits for adult smokers to outweigh the risks to youth. The petitioner, representing the FDA, argues…
…
continue reading
1
United States v. Skrmetti
2:21:10
2:21:10
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:21:10
A case in which the Court will decide whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1, which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the E…
…
continue reading
1
United States v. Skrmetti
2:01:14
2:01:14
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
2:01:14
United States v. SkrmettiSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Hungary v. Simon | 12/03/24 | Docket #: 23-867
…
continue reading
1
Republic of Hungary v. Simon
1:24:02
1:24:02
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:24:02
A case in which the Court will decide whether and how the expropriation exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act applies in cases involving seized property, specifically regarding the requirements for establishing a commercial nexus with the United States and the burden of proof at different stages of litigation.…
…
continue reading
1
Hungary v. Simon
1:12:09
1:12:09
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:12:09
Hungary v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
United States v. Miller | 12/02/24 | Docket #: 23-824
…
continue reading
FDA v. Wages and White Lion | 12/02/24 | Docket #: 23-1038
…
continue reading
1
FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, L.L.C.
1:20:05
1:20:05
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:20:05
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Food and Drug Administration’s orders denying respondents’ applications for authorization to market new e-cigarette products was arbitrary and capricious, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.
…
continue reading
1
United States v. Miller
53:38
53:38
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
53:38
A case in which the Court will decide whether a bankruptcy trustee may avoid a debtor’s tax payment to the United States under 11 U.S.C. § 544(b) when no actual creditor could have obtained relief under the applicable state fraudulent-transfer law outside of bankruptcy.
…
continue reading
1
United States v. Miller
46:03
46:03
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
46:03
United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
FDA v. Wages and White Lion
1:08:46
1:08:46
Прослушать позже
Прослушать позже
Списки
Нравится
Нравится
1:08:46
FDA v. Wages and White LionSupreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
