NCLA Discusses Harrow v. Department of Defense SCOTUS Decision

Administrative Static Podcast

Контент предоставлен 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static. Весь контент подкастов, включая эпизоды, графику и описания подкастов, загружается и предоставляется непосредственно компанией 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static или ее партнером по платформе подкастов. Если вы считаете, что кто-то использует вашу работу, защищенную авторским правом, без вашего разрешения, вы можете выполнить процедуру, описанную здесь https://ru.player.fm/legal.

8M ago 12:30

MP3•Главная эпизода

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on August 13, 2024 17:49 (6M ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

The Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Harrow v. Department of Defense. In this case, the Court reviewed a judgment from the Federal Circuit, which originally stemmed from a decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board. The Federal Circuit had held that the 60-day statutory deadline for Harrow to file his petition for review was a “jurisdictional requirement” and thus “precludes equitable exceptions.”

In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Federal Circuit's judgment. The Court held that the 60-day deadline is not a jurisdictional requirement and therefore does not preclude equitable exceptions.

In this episode, Mark and Jenin discuss how this decision could affect Metal Conversion Technologies, LLC v. United States Department of Transportation, a case for which the NCLA has filed a cert petition.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

105 эпизодов

#News #Government #1360 KHNC #Administrative Static