))
Episode 10: The questionable ethics behind forced smoke inhalation research
Manage episode 387728387 series 2935422
Контент предоставлен Animal-Free Science Advocacy. Весь контент подкастов, включая эпизоды, графику и описания подкастов, загружается и предоставляется непосредственно компанией Animal-Free Science Advocacy или ее партнером по платформе подкастов. Если вы считаете, что кто-то использует вашу работу, защищенную авторским правом, без вашего разрешения, вы можете выполнить процедуру, описанную здесь https://ru.player.fm/legal.
For several years, Animal-Free Science Advocacy has been closely monitoring the use of forced inhalation studies in Australian Institutions.
This led to the development of our report: "Optimising Inhalation Research: Transitioning to Human-relevant Science."
In this episode, we learn from Animal-Free Science Advocacy CEO Rachel Smith about the questionable ethics that surround the use of animals in smoke inhalation studies. These obsolete tests continue to be used in some Australian universities and research institutes.
There are safe, precise and animal-free methods that can be used instead of these tests.
Read our report: Optimising Inhalation Research: Transitioning to Human-relevant Science
Learn more about our Forced to Smoke campaign.
Connect with HRA in the following ways:
Website: https://www.humaneresearch.org.au/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HumaneResearchAustralia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/humaneresearch/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hraust?lang=en
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/humane-research-australia
19 эпизодов
Поделиться
