Episode #393: The Art of Knowing: How AI and Discipline Shape Our Minds and Machines

Crazy Wisdom

In this episode of Crazy Wisdom, host Stewart Alsop talks with Phil Filippak, a software arcanist and knowledgemancer from Ideaflow. The conversation covers a range of topics, including knowledge management, the discipline behind organizing knowledge, personal systems for note-taking, and the impact of AI on programming and game development. Phil shares his experiences with tools like Obsidian and discusses the balance between creative exploration and over-systematization in managing information. You can follow Phil on Twitter at @Blisstweeting (https://twitter.com/Blisstweeting) for more insights.

Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation!

Timestamps

00:00 Introduction to the Crazy Wisdom Podcast

00:49 Phil's Journey and Knowledge Management

02:17 The Discipline of Knowledge Management

05:49 Personal Struggles and Systematization

09:43 AI's Role in Knowledge Management

16:16 The Future of AI and Programming

21:03 Monasteries and the Future of Coding

28:03 Navigating Quests Without Markers

28:46 Evolution of Game Engines

32:02 Creating Games as a Solo Developer

34:42 The Balance Between Art and Commerce in Gaming

45:00 Knowledge Management in Large Companies

52:03 Final Thoughts and Contact Information

Key Insights

1. The Role of Discipline in Knowledge Management: Phil Filippak emphasizes that knowledge management is more than just gathering information—it's about organizing it with discipline. This process involves creating orderly structures, either mentally or through notes, to track progress across different areas of interest. Discipline is crucial for maintaining an interconnected understanding of multiple fields.
2. Over-Systematization Can Be a Trap: While using tools like Obsidian to systematize knowledge can be helpful, Phil warns that too much structure can become burdensome. Over-systematizing can make it harder to add new information and can stifle creativity, leading to a reluctance to engage with the system at all.
3. AI’s Transformative Role in Programming: Phil discusses how AI is changing the landscape of software development, particularly by assisting with tedious tasks like debugging. However, he points out that AI hasn't yet reached a point where it can handle more creative or complex problem-solving without human intervention, leaving room for the enjoyment and intellectual satisfaction that come from manual coding.
4. Creativity in Game Development is Often Stifled by Commercial Pressures: Large gaming companies, driven by shareholder value, tend to avoid risks and stick to formulas that are proven to sell. Phil notes that this limits experimentation, whereas indie game developers and smaller studios—especially in places like Serbia—have more freedom to innovate and take creative risks.
5. Periodic “Resets” in Personal Knowledge Systems: Phil recommends performing occasional resets on personal knowledge systems when they become too complex. This involves stripping away unnecessary rules and simplifying processes to keep the system flexible and sustainable, helping to avoid burnout from excessive structure.
6. The Idea of a Code Monastery: Drawing on the historical role of monasteries as centers of knowledge preservation, Phil introduces the idea of a "code monastery" where programmers could dedicate themselves to maintaining and refining software. This concept highlights the aesthetic and spiritual satisfaction of combining technical expertise with a disciplined, purpose-driven lifestyle.
7. The Future of Programming and AI: Looking ahead, Phil acknowledges that while AI will likely continue to take over more routine programming tasks, there will always be people passionate about coding for its intellectual rewards. He believes that even in an AI-dominated future, the human element of creativity and problem-solving in programming will remain essential.