))
Dismissal from Service
Manage episode 329824233 series 3355479
Контент предоставлен Gaurav Pathak. Весь контент подкастов, включая эпизоды, графику и описания подкастов, загружается и предоставляется непосредственно компанией Gaurav Pathak или ее партнером по платформе подкастов. Если вы считаете, что кто-то использует вашу работу, защищенную авторским правом, без вашего разрешения, вы можете выполнить процедуру, описанную здесь https://ru.player.fm/legal.
Even if the proven offence relates to dishonest conduct of the employee. There cannot be any hard and fast Rule that once the misconduct of theft is proved, the dismissal will be automatic.High Court can interfere with the decision of the Industrial Tribunal under Section 11-A of the I.D. Act only on limited grounds. It cannot substitute its decision for that of the Tribunal. It can interfere with the punishment, if it is found that that the decision of the Tribunal is perverse or one, which no man in his senses will take. Tune in, as we discover what the Jharkhand High Court did in the case of GC Patnayak.
Cause Title: G.C. Patnayak Versus Telco Ltd., Telco Colony, P.O. & P.S. Telco, Rep. through its Managing Director
Case Number: W.P.(L). No. 4707 of 2013
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Citation: [2021] 2 LLJ 396
Instagram: lawandbehold
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lawandbehold/message49 эпизодов
Поделиться
