))
Kennedy v. Braidwood Management: Appointments Clause and HHS Authority
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now.
Last successful fetch was on July 17, 2025 01:59 (
What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 492023459 series 3675085
Контент предоставлен Brian Dennison. Весь контент подкастов, включая эпизоды, графику и описания подкастов, загружается и предоставляется непосредственно компанией Brian Dennison или ее партнером по платформе подкастов. Если вы считаете, что кто-то использует вашу работу, защищенную авторским правом, без вашего разрешения, вы можете выполнить процедуру, описанную здесь https://ru.player.fm/legal.
A Notebook LM review of Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, concerning the constitutionality of appointments to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The core dispute revolves around whether Task Force members are principal officers, requiring presidential nomination and Senate confirmation, or inferior officers, who can be appointed by a department head like the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). The majority opinion concludes they are inferior officers because their work is supervised and directed by the HHS Secretary, who can remove members at will and review their recommendations. Conversely, the dissenting opinion argues that Congress did not explicitly vest the HHS Secretary with appointment authority for the Task Force, contending that the Task Force was intended to operate as an independent body whose members should be appointed by the President.
23 эпизодов
Поделиться
