))
'Copyright in Fictional Characters and the Parody and Pastiche Defences': CIPIL Evening seminar (audio)
Manage episode 455277222 series 3623930
Контент предоставлен Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law, and University of Cambridge. Весь контент подкастов, включая эпизоды, графику и описания подкастов, загружается и предоставляется непосредственно компанией Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law, and University of Cambridge или ее партнером по платформе подкастов. Если вы считаете, что кто-то использует вашу работу, защищенную авторским правом, без вашего разрешения, вы можете выполнить процедуру, описанную здесь https://ru.player.fm/legal.
Speaker: Thomas St Quintin, Hogarth Chambers
Abstract: Lessons from the decision of the IPEC in Shazam v Only Fools the Dining Experience, and cases referred to in that decision, addressing the findings that copyright can subsist in fictional characters (and the factors that the court relied upon in reaching that conclusion), and the defences of fair dealing for the purposes of parody and pastiche.
Biography: Thomas St Quintin is a barrister at Hogarth Chambers. He specialises in intellectual property, media and entertainment. He has been instructed in cases in the Court of Justice of the European Union and the General Court, and has appeared as the sole or lead advocate in each of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, and in the UKIPO. His practice covers all areas of IP law, and is fairly evenly split between patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and confidential information cases (both technical and those involving privacy). He is a co-author of the Modern Law of Trade Marks, of Intellectual Property in Europe, and is a contributor to Copinger and Skone-James on Copyright.
For more information see:
https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars
This entry provides an audio source for iTunes.
146 эпизодов
Поделиться
