))
E-filing outage cause a late filing? & other cases
Manage episode 432854330 series 3344448
Контент предоставлен Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis. Весь контент подкастов, включая эпизоды, графику и описания подкастов, загружается и предоставляется непосредственно компанией Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis или ее партнером по платформе подкастов. Если вы считаете, что кто-то использует вашу работу, защищенную авторским правом, без вашего разрешения, вы можете выполнить процедуру, описанную здесь https://ru.player.fm/legal.
A ransomware attack hit the Los Angeles County Superior Court in July 2024, affecting e-filing services. Did you miss a filing deadline because of this? We discuss two Rules of Court that could help.
We also cover:
- Are anti-SLAPP orders “judgments”?
- Court of Appeal to litigants: Your adverbs are unwelcome here. Ok to say “The order is erroneous.” But not “The order is transparently erroneous.”
- Appeal might be actually late, but constructively on time.
- Two anti-tax initiatives struck down: one too broad, the other too narrow.
- On HOA Christmas party ban, a split 9th Cir. panel with three opinions.
- If you are “seriously annoying” you can get hit with a restraining order, but not for being regular annoying.
Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.
Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.
Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.
The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext’s newest technology, CoCounsel, the world’s first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.
Other items discussed in the episode:
- Lawyer Toolkit: Untimely Appeals May Be Excused If There Was a Mishap with E-Filing, discussing Garg v. Garg (2022) 82 Cal.App.5th 1036, 1041–1042
- Are Anti-SLAPP orders “judgments”? Wastexperts, Inc. v. Arakelian Enters. (D2d4 Jul. 11, 2024 No. B325299) [pub. opn.] (Tim’s writeup)
- Late appeal deemed constructively filed on time, In re Santos (D5 Jun. 6, 2024 No. F087859) [nonpub. opn.] (Tim’s writeup)
- Keeton v. Tesla, Inc.: arb-killer late-fee penalty NOT preempted by FAA
- Legislature v. Weber: Tax initiative held invalid because too broad
- Loeber v. Lakeside Joint School District* Tax initiative held invalid because too narrow
Read the full article here: https://bit.ly/4dsSvL4
154 эпизодов
Поделиться
